A field study was conducted by Barry R. Nathan, Allan M. Mohrman, Jr., and John Milliman to determine the effect of supervisor-subordinate interpersonal relations and the content and conduct of the appraisal review on reactions to the performance appraisal review, and job satisfaction and job performance after the review.
Research and Insights Archive
Research and Insights from the Center for Effective Organizations
Available Content
Obtaining “Purer” or “Poorer” Criteria for Test Validation: An Empirical Test of the Statistical Control of Halo and Implications for Criteria Development
The assertion by Landy et al. (1980) that purer criteria for test validation would result from statistically controlling for halo in dimension ratings by partialing out a general impression rating was investigated by Barry R. Nathan and Nancy Tippins.
Please Sign In
This content is available only to members and requires a valid login. If you are already a member, please log in first, after which you will return to this post.
Register For Complimentary Premium Access
Register for complimentary premium access to our working papers, editorials and webinars. It takes under 30 seconds. Register.
A Comparison of Criteria for Test Validation: A Meta-Analytic Investigation
Barry R. Nathan and Ralph A. Alexander conducted meta-analyses of validity coefficients from tests of clerical abilities for five criteria; supervisor ratings, supervisor rankings, work samples, production quantity, and production quality, and the resulting expected true validities were compared.
Please Sign In
This content is available only to members and requires a valid login. If you are already a member, please log in first, after which you will return to this post.
Register For Complimentary Premium Access
Register for complimentary premium access to our working papers, editorials and webinars. It takes under 30 seconds. Register.